Why I Love Seventeenth Century Midwives
If there’s any group of women anywhere I
have the greatest respect for, it’s the midwives. The job they do, even now,
requires different roles. They support a pregnant woman before birth; they can
be present at the birth and then they often provide post-birth advice and care.
This means they are frequently the source of the most constant contact between
the mother, her children and the medical profession throughout large portions
of her childbearing years. Having a good midwife can make the difference between
being comfortable and happy with the new role of motherhood, help recovering
physically, and mentally and emotionally adapting to a life with a new
dependent. A good midwife can help make that transition smooth; a more
disengaged one can leave a new mother feeling uncertain, insecure, unhappy.
And that’s now.
Three hundred years ago, many women could
act as a midwife for the birth of a family member, friend or neighbour. And,
indeed, it often fell on ladies of quality to tend to births not only one of their
own household, but also of those working for them. For many of these women, the
only experience they might have is of being present at other births, perhaps
watching their mother or another female relative at the bedside. There was no
formal training, only networking. Any woman might fall into this group.
But there was another group: midwives who
regularly attended births both near and far away, and were paid for it, made a
living from it. A decent living at that, in many cases. Good midwives were
highly sought after, and when a woman found one, they continued to retain them
for future births, as well as spread the word this was a midwife you could
trust. These woman often learned their trade through apprenticeships lasting
many years, and obtained a licence to practice based on the testimonials of
several different women who had been birthed by them.
I’ve discovered something special about
this group of women. They have certain qualities that make them stand out at a
time when women were supposed to be subservient. Perhaps it is because they
were able to retain a certain level of independence, or perhaps it is because
they were given certain privileges of entry into places other women were
forbidden (if the wife of a coffee house owner was having a baby, the midwife
was bound to be allowed entry, when they wouldn’t otherwise be). Or perhaps it
is because they had to bravely walk to and from births whether by day or
through dark, unlit streets at all hours of the night. Something made this
group of
women brave.
As I did my seventeenth century research
for The Popish Midwife, delving into the life of Elizabeth Cellier who stood up
in court for her belief, I came across Anne Hutchinson in Boston, famous for defending
the right of a person to think for herself. At least three others wrote a book
(Louise Bourgeois in France; and Jane Sharp and Elizabeth Cellier in England). There
were many more outstanding midwives.
The story I’m currently writing is
different from these. It’s about infamous rather than famous midwife, Marie
Desormeaux. She murdered her husband and planted bits of his body to be found
all over London. However, I argue that, after years of abuse, she was desperate
enough to take her life into her own hands. I no way condone murder, but in
that time beating your wife was
condoned, desirable even, to bring her under control. And when that power fell
into the hands of a man who physically, emotionally and sexually abused his
wife, several times to the point of near-death, I can understand her
desperation. It was either him or her.
Even in this awful situation, Marie showed
aspects of character similar to the other midwives of the time – that inner
strength, confidence and belief in herself.
So many midwives of the time stood out,
whether for good or for bad; accused of witchcraft but more likely employed to
search for witch-marks; of being a whore, yet conversely of their wisdom in the
lore of nature and birth; of being drunks or for their calm in dealing with births
going wrong. Whatever their reputation, there was something about them that
brought forth strong feelings one way or another. And for that I’m grateful. It
means they were talked about, recorded, for good or ill, leaving traces and
trails to follow today.
I came upon Elizabeth Cellier’s story by
accident (I won pages recording her trial in an auction), but once I saw what
an interesting person she was, her notoriety, that she was talked about, made
fun of, I was able to find clues about her in so many different places, all
waiting for me to put together and create her story. I think you’ll agree her
story is exciting and worth reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment